Comparison of Sports

Michigan is ranked very highly in the world of athletics and academics. We are guaranteed to offer an excellent education and, of course, great sports. While the football team may not have done that well this year, Michigan does have a tremendous reputation to preform at the top level in all sports. There is a history of excellence here that can not be beat by any university, especial those Buckeyes. The team and school spirit is infectious making the atmosphere of ever game incredible exciting.

While only being here a few months, I have been to several sporting events, including basketball and cross country. I love watching people represent Michigan and seeing people preform at the top level. Both the basketball team and the cross country team are ranking very highly and consistently put on a good show. Besides their reputation, Cross County and Basketball are (obviously) very different. The way they preform, play, train, celebrate, and even win are very different for each other. However I believe the biggest difference, as a fan of each sport, is the spectators.


Eric Dunning

It is truly amazing what spectators can do for athletes in a sport. They can change the tone and excitement of the game which has great effect on the athletes. When I attended the men’s basketball game against Syracuse, the emotions were high and everyone was excited. When Doyle through down a crazy dunk, I couldn’t even hear myself think. It was wild in there and you could tell Irving loved it. He was screaming, and chest bumping and stomping around like he owned the building. It was an incredible display, almost acted out for the crowd. But maybe that is all spectator sports are: Displays, performances. I think Eric Dunning might even agree and state, “We are no longer playing to play. We are playing for display.” Having a crowd cheer you on is a huge motivation and bonus. Your level of performance might even increase because of the crowd. While in attendance of the game, I got the feeling the athletes were playing for us, the people watching the game, rather than themselves. They pointed to the crowd and thanked us for every basket. It was like we were the reason the basketball team was winning. Basketball is all about the show they put on. They even made basketball a literal performance with the Harlem Globetrotters.


Doyle against Syracuse

This is very different from the cross country team where there are no spectators. It is not a very glorious sport. There is no screaming fans or incredible excitement which really changes the dynamic. Because there really are no spectators, there is no display. It is not a “show” that you can go see, like a basketball game. People run for the love of the sport. They run to get better, stronger and faster. They don’t do it for the crowd or anyone else besides themselves (and the team). If you went to a race you would never see the athletes high five the crowd or each other in the middle of the competition. They are serious and determined. Their face hardly even changes shape or expression.

Runners and Basketball players compete for different things because of the spectators. While they still compete to win and, as Dunning would agree, play with incredible seriousness, these athletes have different motivations that change the nature of the game. I had a great time at each event but you could definitely tell how different the athletes play and perform when there is a crowd and when there is not.



  1. smithjrw · December 3, 2014

    Wow. That was a great way to relate two different sports and their respective fans (or lack thereof). I can definitely agree with the point that spectators have a tremendous impact on the game. That’s because a loud crowd can throw the opposing team off their game and it can raise the energy level of their own team at the very same time. A lot of times, if the crowd isn’t in it, I have seen teams go flat in their play. On the other side of things, like you said, cross country is a different world because spectators are irrelevant. I have attended a cross country event in the past and I haven’t been back, reason being I have no reason to go.


  2. acfalk2 · December 3, 2014

    I really enjoyed your blog post! You make a great point, because the crowd truly does effect the play within each sport. In sports such as basketball and football the crowd is usually very big, and players are often seen interacting with the crowd, whether it is them jumping into the stands after scoring a touchdown, or holding up the Three Goggles after making a deep three. The players in this sport are clearly more interactive than sports such as Cross country and golf that do not pull as many spectators. Another big aspect that determines whether or not the event will pull a big crowd would be whether it was a mens or women’s game. The men’s basketball pulls a significantly larger crowd than the women’s basketball team, and therefore you see them being pumped up more than the crowd than the women’s team. I do think the crowd effects the play of athletes, sometimes causing adrenaline rushes that elevate their play, but this can also cause negative effects. Playing in front of such a large crowd can cause players to crack under pressure more easily than they would’ve infront of a smaller crowd.


  3. maxmcquaid · December 7, 2014

    This post is very interesting. You make a good point about how a crowd changes the way a sport is played. I went to both the Syracuse and NJIT basketball games, and thought it was interesting how crowds in the same sport were different, and how they changed the game. I noticed that during the Syracuse game, spectators were cheering and encouraging Michigan, and sort of helped the team win. During the NJIT game, which we lost, I saw that a lot of fans were making fun of the other team and referees instead of rooting for Michigan. It was interesting to see how the supportive crowd enhanced Michigan’s performance, and how the crowd that was paying more attention to the other team almost made them play worse.


Comments are closed.